1. Another Harcourt Street Listing Emerges With Initial 8-Digit Hopes

    image

    image

    ‘Katoomba’, a c1883 Victorian mansion on the über prestigious Harcourt Street in Hawthorn East has come to market with bullish $10m+ hopes, according to Domain.com.au. It’s a rare event that two ‘original’ homes on Harcourt Street are both on market at the same time, but that is indeed the case since Federation mansion ‘Talana’ at the entrance to this grand streetscape has remained on the market for over a year with its now slightly reduced $8m+ hopes

    The initial subdivision of land in this pocket of Hawthorn East occurred in the midst of the Gold Rush. According to a 1993 Hawthorn Heritage Study: 

    With the separation of Victoria from the mother colony of New South Wales and the beginning of the gold-rush era in 1851, the price of colonial land dropped and, as a consequence, there was an increased demand for Hawthorn allotments by eager speculators. The value of these purchases trebled in the next few years. Most notable was James Murphy’s purchase of allotment 70, 124 acres on the north west corner of Burke and Barkers Road, which became known as Murphy’s Paddock. This was later carved up by Murphy in a mid-1850s private subdivision into the Village of Rathmines Estate, which included the important Harcourt Street area…

    Harcourt Street’s staying power since its first subdivision during the Gold Rush years of the 19th Century owes, in part, to the highly rectangular blocks of land. In 1857, we were able to dig up the below parcel map that reveals Harcourt Street’s subdivision (between what is now Barkers Road and Rathmines Road, but what was then referred to as ‘Westmoreland Street’ and the unnamed ‘Government Road’). The area between Auburn Road and Kildare Street - the most prestigious pocket of 1k long road owing to its elevated views - was subdivided into twelve just-shy-of-2-acre blocks of land.

    image

    The first subdivision of Harcourt Street in 1857, then referred to as ‘Village of Rathmines’.

    Of these original twelve, only one home retains its original parcel size (#5, although even that estate chopped off a small portion of its backyard for the inter-war subdivision of the Maurice Street cul-de-sac at the property’s rear). Even Talana, the show-stopping Federation at the entrance to the road siphoned off three properties (1A and 3 Harcourt Street, 25 Auburn Road) at various times. But that’s a digression. It is unclear to the Radical Terrace how many homes were developed during the Gold Rush era - likely very few - but by the end of the Land Boom of the 1880s, architect John Beswicke’s Italianate designs proliferated on slightly reduced blocks. Beswicke’s designs began in the 1870s and were constructed mostly for his own family - including ‘Carn Brae’ (c1873, 5 Harcourt Street), ‘Hilton House’ (c1880-81, 13 Harcourt Street), and Rotha (1887-88, 29 Harcourt Street). (For the record, although Katoomba held its own amongst its neighbours, it was merely one of at least a dozen aesthetically pleasing homes on the road.) Most parcels were subdivided by owner-developers in such a way as to maintain their Harcourt Street frontage, making the parcel even more narrow. Such narrow parcels are likely the saving grace for Harcourt Street as it greatly reduced the feasibility for parcel subdivision (after all, we all want to front a street!). On the contrary, Barkers Road which was home to a larger number of imposing mansions at the turn of the century than Harcourt Street, possessed many estates that sat on substantial - and square - blocks. These square blocks, along with the increasing traffic of the thoroughfare, paved the way for substantial 20th century subdivisions. 

    image

    Turn of the century MMBW map shows a nameless Katoomba with a central circular driveway where the tennis court now stands and estensive outbuildings and sheds (above). ‘Katoomba’, interestingly enough, didn’t score a mention as a prominent neighbour in the subdivision land sale along nearby Higham Road in 1900 (below).

    image

    At the turn of the century, Harcourt Street offered a unique pocket of grand Victorian living. Unlike Toorak, where large estates still existed unfettered and with hefty distances between them, Harcourt Street provided its residents with a unified streetscape of imposing, but consistent housing stock. The above MMBW map reveals Victorian and Federation Free Style homes of comparable size as existed in the contemporaneous suburbs of Malvern and Hawthorn but on far deeper lots, enabling Harcourt Street homes to rest on imposing gardens. According to the aforementioned Hawthorn Heritage Study:

    Recognising the prime hill top location and the genteel reputation Hawthorn had acquired, the Harcourt Street area was amongst the first land to be redivided after the Government block land sales. The enormous block sizes and the desirable location were the key features in what was in effect a speculative mansion house development, promoted by the Beswicke family. Harcourt Street quickly became a fashionable address. Development in Auburn Road and Lyndhurst Crescent capitalized on the existing image to consolidate this region as a highly desirable Victorian period suburb for the wealthy. In contrast, the adjoining Rathmines Village area to the south, developed on the back of the mansion houses with small servicing quarters (Rathmines Grove) and more modest but respectable housing for the middle class. …[This area is of] local significance for the illustration of the flow on effect of early mansion house construction on the type of construction in the surrounding area, creating nodes of high status housing on hills, and is typical of the mixed Hawthorn character elsewhere.

    The St James Park Estate off Shakespeare Grove in Hawthorn East is likely the only extant comparable for Harcourt Street’s homes size and vintage. Which is likely why Katoomba’s highly bullish asking price seems to be directly influenced by Avon Court - one of Melbourne’s most expensive home’s sold which likely sold for slightly above $20m in 2009. Two other sales closer to home also influence Katoomba’s price. East of Kildare Street, Harcourt Street’s prestige slips along with the elevation and features a higher number of early-20th C Federation homes. Among these, 49 Harcourt Street (surprisingly) holds the street price record for its 2010 sale of $7.3m. Furthermore, Strathroy at 482 Barkers Road, an imposing c1882 Victorian Italianate villa that sits on nearly an acre of land on the busy road, sold for a suburb record of $9.0m in 2010, in a vaguely renovated state. Katoomba itself last traded for $4.4m in 2004 and has since undergone an extensive and tasteful renovation that propels its value well into the 8-digits. How far into this unchartered territory will be fleshed out in time. But we’d like to remind our readers that Talana, a home that holds richer architectural heritage, but far poorer interior qualities for a modern family, has remained on the market for over a year with an $8.0m+ asking price. Nonetheless, Katoomba has much going for it: Paul Bangay-designed gardens (fast becoming an imperative for any mega-listing in Melbourne) and interiors by Stuart Rattle, a noted Neo-Classical interior designer. The tennis court, pool, “summer house”, and district views (that once stretched from the Dandenong Ranges to the Bay before the neighbourhood trees matured) certainly help the home’s big price ambitions.

    image

    The listing: ‘Katoomba’, 31 Harcourt Street, Hawthorn East

    image

    Click below for more photos of the interior and a FLOOR PLAN!

    Read More

  2. $11m Toorak Listing Weirdly Makes No Mention of Its Courtyard

    An aerial image of 8 Whernside Avenue (above) revealing its prominent central courtyard (a feature shared with its next-door neighbour); a floor plan of the courtyard home is below; also note the crazy tennis rivalries that must abound on the block…

    A home that’s always piqued our interest from our Google Maps trolling has come to market, revealing itself and its prominent and unique (for Melbourne) courtyard-centric floor plan. The $11m+ home located on the prestigious Whernside Avenue (between the over-the-top Hopetoun Road and the slightly more subdued Albany Road) last traded hands in 2004 for $5m. The home has been renovated since then and now features extensive use of sandstone flooring both indoors and outdoors juxtaposed against dark window treatments that work well together. Oddly enough, the listing agents make no mention of the home’s most attention worthy feature - its courtyard - only flirting with the idiosyncratic architectural feature by referencing “views of the landscaped garden area”. C’mon guys, spit it out: c-o-u-r-t-y-a-r-d. More tragic is that the listing also fails to make any mention of the architect behind the project; we’d love to know. 

    Surprising to some, the $5m sale of this property in 2004 makes it the priciest home to sell on the block, owing mostly to the fact that the 11 other homes have seldom traded. The petit road is home to some far more impressive homes, most notably the c1877 mansion ‘Whernside’ (née ‘Belcroft’), whose 1916 subdivision led to the creation of Whernside Avenue (see parcel map below). Also interesting is next-door neigbhour 6 Whernside Avenue also has a similar footprint with a prominent central courtyard, making these two side-by-side abodes somewhat anomalous in the Toorak real estate world. 

    The listing: 8 Whernside Avenue, Toorak

    Click below for more images of the property and a site plan.

    Read More

  3. Bidding Adieu to Vaucluse’s Shortest-Lived Compound


    Yet another Vaucluse harbourfront for sale…

    Only a year after the Blundy Family assembled a $25.7m Vaucluse compound by buying two properties, one of the two homes has listed with $20m+ expectations. 8 Wharf Road was acquired for $17.75m in 2011 at the same time the new owners purchased next-door neigbhour 58 The Crescent for $7.95m. The acquisition provided the Blundys with over 2,000sqm of Vaucluse harbourfront land. Now, the owners are shedding the compound’s pricier home and its only link to the water: 8 Wharf Road. Interestingly enough for property watchers, the listing joins two other Wharf Road harbourfront homes on the market. Of the three properties, 8 Wharf Road likely commands the highest price, if only for its larger parcel size of 1600sqm that accommodates a tennis court (playing tetris, natch) and its sandier harbour setting on Kutti Beach. Perhaps pricing the home $2m higher than it traded for just last year is in response to the meaty $10m+ and $15m+ asking prices of its immediate neigbhours?

    The Blundys seems to have made no alterations to the 5-bedroom, 5-bathroom mid-90s modern home. In fact, the only change we could spot between listings is a boundary line tweak. In September, the owners submitted a DA to Woollahra council to “reinstate original lot boundary of No 8 Wharf Road and 58 The Crescent”. And with that, we bid adieu to the shortest-lived harbourfront compound in Vaucluse. 

    The listing: 8 Wharf Road, Vaucluse

    Click below for more listing photos and a FLOOR PLAN!

    Read More

  4. An Original Bungalow in Caulfield North Seeking $3m+

    Prior to the First World War, the area now referred to as Caulfield North was characterised by a small handful of significant Victorian mansions (Labassa, Grimwade House, and Rosecraddock, to name a few), market gardens, and a few hubs of inconsequential homes along the primary thoroughfares. The quick and dramatic expansion of Melbourne’s suburbs in the interwar years saw the development of Caulfield North into a solidly middle class suburb, with expansive subdivisions of the mansions and market gardens. Before the war, the City of Caulfield (largely comprising of what is now the City of Glen Eira) had a population of just shy of 16,000. Within 22 years, by 1933, the population reached over 65,000 and the suburb was effectively built out. Labassa Grove, the road staking claim to the featured listing, was a byproduct of a 1916 subdivision of land south of Inkerman Road. In 1923, ‘Delmar’ at 20 Labassa Grove was constructed in the popular and contemporaneous Arts and Crafts style with strutted eaves, casement windows, and a rendered brick exterior. The symmetry of the house is broken up by a projecting attic floor which the Radical Terrace assumes to be an original feature of the home and not a later addition. 

    This listing is unique for two key reasons. One, the architectural cohesion of Labassa Grove (and Caulfield North overall) has greatly diminished in the last several decades. This is a result of Caulfield North’s “prestige bump” in the 1980s. During that decade, the relative desirability of the suburb increased dramatically with an influx of high-earning expatriates. Many of these new residents demolished dated original homes in favour of grander, modern abodes. Delmar, on the contrary, has maintained its architectural integrity. Secondly, the floor plan indicates to us that no internal structural changes have occurred. Despite the interior of the home being cleaned up with fresh paint and carpet, there has been no introduction of recessed lighting, no integrated kitchen, and no other changes. Even the fireplaces and doorways appear to be in original condition and there’s a detached garage. While all of these original character features are indeed desirable, some modern demands of luxury living are noticeably absent. 

    Pricing this home for agent Leonard Persichetti must have been a bit of a challenge. No home has traded on Labassa Grove since 2008 as far as we can ascertain. The last sale was #14 which sat on a smaller block (~850sqm compared to Delmar’s 1,533sqm) and garnered an impressive $2.75m. The other smaller homes sold around the same time as #14 in the mid-$1mils. Although Delmar presents itself beautifully from the street, features an uncharacteristically large parcel for the street, and stakes claim to a tennis court (playing tennis tetris, mind you), buyers into the Caulfield North market might be in search of something more modern and commodious for the $3m+ price Delmar is seeking. The 5-bedroom home is to auction in December. 

    The listing: ‘Delmar’, 20 Labassa Grove, Caulfield North

    Click below for more images and the (likely original) FLOOR PLAN!

    Read More

  5. A “Toorak Court” Residence Testing the Waters Again with $6m+ Hopes

    An aesthetically pleasing, stone-filled home at the end of a court street in Toorak has hit the market once again after a 6-month absence. It first listed through Kay & Burton in May 2009 for 6 months, failing to find a buyer. It returned to market in November 2010 spending 18 months in vain, represented by Marshall White. Now, we’re treated to the home once again. Purely based on the photos provided, it’s bamboozling that this home was not a quick sell. It has a functional floor plan with solid proportions, a tennis court, pool, and a modern conservatory. And even though we strongly dislike some of the interiors (Seriously. No. More. Carpet.), they are all an easy fix. So what gives? Two potentials: this micro-pocket of Toorak, although on high ground, is a straight shot off Toorak Road and is not as desirable as other Toorak Courts situated off quieter streets. The more likely explanation is the tricky pricing of this property. Throwing off the valuation of 11 Grosvenor Court is the bizarrely bullish sale of 5 Grosvenor Court in 2007 when it traded hands for a very high $9.5m. That home, for all intents and purposes, is the inferior to #11 (smaller parcel of land, awkwardly cramped tennis court and pool, shoddy Neo-Neo-Georgian architecture…). On top of that, the vendors purchased the home for a big 1988 price: $1.5m. Those factors add-up, and if I were the vendor, I would go into the home sale expecting a big price as well. But all those hopes continued to slash the more time the home was on the market. And now this go around, Domain is indicating a far more modest $6m+ asking price. We’ll see how the desired sale pans out this go around. 

    —- Just for fun —-


    ‘Grosvenor’, the mansion that graced the Grosvenor Estate until its interwar subdivision. Below, the original subdivision advertisement from ”The Argus”.

    “A Most Suitable and Excellent Plan of Subdivision Has Been Decided Upon.

    GROSVENOR COURT, the New Private Road will Enter the Estate from Toorak Road, Along the Western Boundary, A Portion of the Adjoining Property Having Been Purchased by the Vendors.

    Six Allotments Will Have Frontages to Grosvenor Court. Three Magnificent Sites Front on to Toorak Road…

    Frontages vary from 60Ft. to 100 Ft; depths from 120Ft. to 207Ft.

    Every Care Has Been Taken by the Vendors to Preserve as Far as Possible the Magnificent and Well Matured Trees and Shrubs.

    The New Concrete Road Will be Built Early in the New Year, at the Expense of the Vendors, as well as Water, Sewerage, Gas, and Electricity will be made available to all the Allotments.

    THE MANSION RESIDENCE Will Be Sold [?] by Demolition”

    —- —- —-

    Check out more images of 11 Grosvenor Court below, along with some solid floor plan porn. 

    The official listing: 11 Grosvenor Court, Toorak

    Read More

  6. Boom Time Mansion ‘Rathgar’ (Falsely Attributed to John Edmund Burke) to Auction for $5m+

    An 1886 Boom Time mansion in Hawthorn East is to auction late in September through Abercromby’s agents Jock Langley and Andrew Harlock with $5m+ expectations. The agents are flaunting its architectural pedigree saying that is “thought to be designed by John Edmund Burke”. However, the Radical Terrace found no such links between the home now listed and the Melbourne architect. The origin of that urban myth came from local historian Meredith Gould who theorized in her 1994 Conservation Study that the original owner of Rathgar - John Burke - may be the father of John Edmund Burke. While a John Burke was indeed the father of John Edmund Burke, the architect son was born in 1868 (meaning he would have only been 18 at the time of Rathgar’s construction) and did not begin his architectural practice until 1890, making it an improbable stretch that he was the architect of the home. Furthermore, Burke wasn’t a particularly distinguished architect in the first place to be worthy of such note. 

    Regardless, that historical flub doesn’t take away from the heritage significance of the home now listed for sale. ‘Rathgar’ is situated at the corner of the aptly named Grandview Grove (and the now well-trafficked Victoria Road), where a number of double storey Victorian brick villas were constructed in the boom years of the 1880s, taking advantage of its elevated location and views to the city skyline. The convenience of the recently opened railway stations at Auburn and Camberwell provided a direct link to the Melbourne CBD and added to the area’s desirability at the time of construction.

    The home has been well-maintained, keeping its tennis court in the same position all these years, as is evidenced in the parcel map below. According to a 2007 City of Boroondara study of Grade B Heritage buildings, “Rathgar is a fine and relatively externally intact example of a substantial two-storey Italianate villa of the late 1880s.  Constructed at the height of the boom, the house is an imposing, albeit conventional, example of a relatively common Boroondara typology. Later additions are generally to the rear of the house and do not detract from its presentation.” We couldn’t have said it better ourselves. 

    The five-bedroom home with pool and tennis court has beautiful grounds but a completely uninspiring interior. A number of trophy Hawthorn properties have sold this year with another round of listings on the market at present, meaning Rathgar’s listing is likely jumping on the back of Hawthorn’s recent popularity. 

    And for the record, Rathgar last sold for a whopping $1.37m in May 1993, a big price for the day. Grandview Grove is considered the second most prestigious street in Hawthorn East (after Harcourt Street) and has commanded prices as high as $4.84m (#14 in 2005). Victoria Road has also garnered some high prices, despite its more eclectic and crowded streetscape: 159 Victoria Road, a far smaller single story Victorian, sold for $3.46m in May 2010.

    1895 site plan (above) and Google Maps aerial (below) reveal infill development and the addition of a pool, garaging, rear extension, and an expanding Victoria Road sidewalk.

    Click below for more property images, listing information, and FLOOR PLAN!

    Read More

  7. Kay & Burton Land Yet Another Toorak Trophy Listing

    Kay & Burton have landed yet another Toorak mansion listing. Of the 20 properties currently listed in Toorak above $5m, Kay & Burton can stake claim to 12 of them. The latest of their offerings is 779 Orrong Road and the price is $8m+.

    The listing is most definitely a flip. Last sold for $6.8m in May 2010, the current owners have thankfully ripped out the unsightly portico, Keating-era flooring and carpeting, and modernised the kitchen (BONUS: see 2010 listing photo below). It was a pretty basic renovation; but it works. The four-bedroom inter-war home is situated in a more understated precinct of the suburb, but is still just a stone’s throw from 3 Towers Road, currently the most expensive home listing in Melbourne. Future owners can also claim bragging rights to a tennis court (albeit one that sadly plays tennis tetris) and a quirky pool and backyard that were also improved from the 2010 sale. Andrew Baines and Ross Savas of Kay & Burton South Yarra have the listing: 779 Orrong Road, Toorak

    BEFORE/AFTER:

  8. One of Brighton’s Largest Mansions Chops Off Some Land

    Today, a land listing on The Esplanade in the heart of Brighton’s Golden Mile came on the market, asking $4m for its postage-stamp sized 825sqm lot. Although a raw chunk of land being listed on The Esplanade is likely Radical Terrace worthy in its own right, this listing carries even more significance as it’s being chopped off from the long-listed mega-mansion ‘Kinane’. Kinane (pictured below) last sold in July 2006 for $9m and emerged on the market over a year ago with $20m+ hopes. It would have provided the owners with quite a hefty profit had it sold - but, alas, no takers. So what are agents Ian Jackson (Kay & Burton Brighton), Jacqueline Maggs, and Jonathan Dixon (J P Dixon Real Estate) to do? Shave off the swimming pool and tennis court!

    Kinane’s listing: 2 Kinane Street, Brighton

    The parcel listing: 92 The Esplanade, Brighton

  9. Oceanfront Tennis Tetris: Rare, Indeed!

    A Collaroy oceanfront home (pictured above) with a coveted tennis court on a 1,365sqm block sold for $8.7m at auction this weekend. Even Jonathan Chancellor made mention of the “rare” nature of such a well-located tennis court. But it also begs the question, how rare are these tetris-playing oceanfront tennis courts? The Radical Terrace decided to find out. Our criteria:

    • First, we limited our search to those homes strictly on the beachfront or beachfront reserve land (that means the 100+ tennis courts that front Sydney Harbour, Middle Harbour, Pittwater, and the Shire are off the list. 
    • No paved roads can be in between the tennis court and the water (say goodbye ‘Kalua’ in Palm Beach and 26 Marine Parade, Maroubra) even if the roads are private (sorries to be said to the exclusive North Curl Curl enclave off Ian Street that share a communal tennis court just behind a private road).

    Here are the remaining victors, in north-to-south order:

    • 71 Narrabeen Park Parade, Warriewood. Last sold in May 2000 for a mere $750k. Not bad for a home surrounded on all sides by reserve land. 

    • 10 Lord Howe St, Dover Heights, this home hasn’t traded hands since 1982.
    • 16 Lord Howe St, Dover Heights, this home hasn’t traded hands since 1984.

    • 1C Mermaid Ave, Maroubra. Traded hands in 1990 for $611k.

    And that’s it. A grand total of five oceanfront homes have tennis courts in the Sydney metropolitan area. Rare, indeed!

  10. Tennis Tetris: Ranking Australia’s 10 Best Examples

    The Radical Terrace surfed around Google Maps to find the most dense examples of tennis courts in Australian suburbs. Not surprisingly, hot spots for tennis courts include Sydney’s Upper North Shore and Melbourne’s Eastern Suburbs. And even though Portsea likes to (anecdotally) claim to have the “most tennis courts per capita” in the country, it looks like Hawthorn’s Scotch Hill precinct may pose a rivalry to Portsea’s prominence. 

    **All photos are screen grabs from GoogleMaps**

  11. Tennis Tetris, Anyone?

    Can you imagine the couples tennis rivalries that exist on Hawthorn’s Kooyongkoot Road?!? 

    Having a tennis court adds value to a house, right? Sure, it makes sense. Another amenity, another drawcard, a status symbol, tennis courts are synonymous with prestige real estate in Australia (especially in Melbourne). But is there a point in which a tennis court detracts from a home’s value? Why do so many homeowners add a tennis court at the expense of a pool, lawn, or even a driveway?!?   

    Enter the just listed 34 Ellsa St in Melbourne’s Balwyn North…

    Situated in the sought-after Balwyn High School zone, the home is your run-of-the-mill Balwyn North McMansion: Neo-Classical-French-Chateau-Revival architecture, 5-bedrooms, underground 4-car garage, and tennis court. But not just any tennis court; unfortunately for 34 Elssa St, they couldn’t quite squeeze in a doubles tennis court, so a singles court had to suffice. Was the tennis court addition really worth it? Wouldn’t the family Labradoodle Fido or children Hamish and Edwina gain more utility out of a grassy lawn? Paul Pfieffer and Mark Wridgway of RT Edgar Toorak have the home & singles court listing and want a cool $2.4m+ for the property. 34 Elssa Street, Balwyn North 

    Seeing the above tennis court sandwiched into the property makes you think: would a plain and simple garden or a level lawn bump the price of this property? Is a tennis court only a value-add improvement where significant excess land exists? And if so, are there any precedents where a home has sold for a higher price after a tennis court has been removed? Now enter ‘Carrara’, one of Sydney’s indisputable trophy properties, and a home that has traded hands enough times (3) in the past 20 years to serve as a bellwether for Sydney harbourfront real estate. Carrara first appears on our pricing radar in 1993 when the home sold for $8.5mFast forward to July 2006 and the two-storey manse high above Sydney Harbour and Milk Beach sold for $22.3m, the second-highest price sale of the year behind the $24m sale of the iconic ‘Bang & Olufsen’ house on Wolseley Crescent, Point Piper. In 2007, the new owners of Carrara lodged a $144k Development Application to Woollahra Council including “replacement of the tennis court with a landscaped area.” Speed up another three years and in May 2010, Carrara sold for $26.7m, with its tennis court replaced with a flat, grassy expanse (see below images).

    Carrara as seen from the Harbour

    Tennis court-turned-“landscaped area”

    No tennis played here.

    Looks good to us. Now stay tuned, the Radical Terrace will find our favourite examples of Tennis Tetris and provide y’all with a sexy slideshow.